top of page

Claudia's Open Letter to City Council on I-93 Expansion & Incorporating a "Deck Park"

Dear City Councilors, TPAC Committee members, Mr. Aspell,

Having lived in Concord the past 31 years and in Boscawen 15 years before that, and in Concord one year before that, I feel I have a good understanding of the community. I served 9 years on the Concord Board of Education and have been involved with numerous not-for-profit organizations in the community as well as the Concord Chamber of Commerce. I commuted to Manchester for 25 years for my profession and am certainly familiar with the stretch of I-93 and all the exits involved in NHDOT’s widening etc. proposal. I worked in downtown Concord the last ten years of my professional working life.

I attended the TPAC meeting on August 9 to hear the current iteration of I-93 plans. I write to

share some thoughts because I will be unable to attend the August 25 meeting when public

comment will be taken. Please make this letter part of the public record on this matter.

1. Why do we want more lanes for people to speed through Concord?

Traffic jams are the City’s friend—people will stop and come to downtown to get relief from sitting in their cars. That is all good for our downtown economy. I have no problem with redoing the exits and that, Gene McCarthy said, would in itself improve the flow of traffic. But we don’t need to widen the lanes for more cars to speed through our city in order to reach

a pinch point somewhere north of us. More lanes mean more traffic—the South End

already has traffic noise—do we need to make it worse for people? More lanes just

mean more cars and more traffic and in no time the traffic jam will be back. Then what?

Why are we doing this? These questions have been asked over an over. Am I beating a

dead horse? You can see examples of road widening effects all over the country. For

example, In Los Angeles the 405 was widened due to congestion and the amount of

traffic just increased. If you build it, they will come. And they will whizz right by


2. I hope that with all the planning the city has done over the years, you have carefully

considered how the I-93 project connects to the findings of these planning efforts. And

that you have refreshed yourselves on the goals of the city as articulated in the plans

and have thought about why those goals were articulated in the first place and how the

proposed changes to I-93 affect those goals. This is not a minor matter. I hope that all

those plans and studies haven’t been relegated to a drawer marked “plan done” and

then forgotten about. Here’s a list of plans I am aware of:

  • 20/20 Vision for Concord, NH (2001)

  • Concord Opportunity Corridor Master Plan (2005)

  • Master Plan 2030 (2008)

  • Bicycle Master Plan (2010)

  • Merrimack River Greenway Trail Feasibility Study (2010)

  • Concord’s New Front Door (2013)

  • Comprehensive Transportation Policy (2015)

  • Pedestrian Master Plan (2017

Do the NHDOT plans meet the goals of the city as articulated in these plans?

3. In particular I want to point out the Master Plan for 2030 (2008) which provides that an

important feature of the transportation-land use interface is a connection over I-93

from the “Opportunity Corridor” to the Merrimack River between exits 13 and 14. My

hope is that you will find the political will to follow the terms of the Master Plan. I

believe a deck park will accomplish this goal.

4. The Opportunity Corridor Master Plan (2005) provides that the Opportunity Corridor is

the City’s highest priority economic development effort with its focus on redevelopment

and an intensive mix of land uses (e.g. offices, retail, services, institutional, high density

residential, lodging). I know you are working on implementing these economic

development and land use initiatives. I believe a deck park will enhance at the very least

the residential aspect of such development. And it would attract more people to

downtown Concord in general.

5. I believe that Concord citizens all want Concord to be competitive and not just some

backwater town that happens to be the state capital because of historical circumstance.

The I-93 project is not just a transportation project. This project should improve the

Concord experience for people, businesses and land-use. It is a project that is very

important to our city’s image. We want to improve that image many people get as they

drive by us on the highway. We want to be seen as innovative rather than stagnant.

Furthermore, the project will affect the quality of life in Concord as well as our


6. One good effect of the project would be an effort that compliments the I-93 project: to

comply with the Master Plan’s recommendation of river access between exits 13 and 14.

The question would be how to do that in a meaningful way. I submit that connecting the

MRGT to the west side of the river and the northern rail trail is insufficient, but a great

idea as far as it goes.

7. The I-93 project can create new opportunities for the city. Like a deck park (highway cap).

8. How about another connection between the two now-separated sides of the city via a car-free park with playground, benches, pathways, meadows, plants and shade trees? How about a significant new park in Concord that happens to lie on a deck that stretches over the river to connect both sides and to bring people physically together? This would be akin to an old New England town common or public garden. Such a park would enhance the Opportunity Corridor development. It would draw people in and it would give residents a chance to get outside into a park environment. People do not have to

live in a concrete jungle. All the years I worked in downtown Concord it was hard to find

a nice lunch time walk from downtown. A park like this also would be good for less

mobile people who can’t get to the many boat access points for the river or who can’t

ride bikes any longer or who can’t go on long walks to get to the river.

9. A deck park will give the City a place to bridge the space between east and west sides of

the river. A way to join rather than continue to be divided. Activities might include open

air films, walking, jogging, playing, sitting within view of the river to see the capital dome

and catch river breezes and cooler air on hot sultry days, connecting to MRGT another

way, and restoration of ties between neighborhoods divided by the highway and the

river—using the river as a way to bridge the divide. That seems so poetic. And just.

10. Let’s not miss this opportunity to explore the possibility of doing something terrific for

the city, its residents and visitors and its economy. Let’s not let money get in the way of

vision. Let’s have someone who knows about deck parks conceptualize a variety of

alternatives. Then let’s get some input on possible costs. Then let’s get an experience

deck park engineer to draw up a plan for whatever design is chosen, tailor it to possible

federal funding source requirements and then let’s see what it costs. THEN let’s apply

for Tiger Grants or whatever other federal funds are available to the city for this project.

I believe the money can be found if the city has the will to push hard enough for it.

And if nothing comes through for us, at least we tried to articulate a vision and to make

it reality. No one could fault you for trying. But please do not fail to try because you are

afraid of the costs.

11. As the Mayor said August 9, and many others have said it as well, including the City

Manager a few years ago, “This is a once-in-a lifetime opportunity.” Let’s seize the time!

12. Deck parks of various scales have been built in a variety of cities in the country. We

have the Hi-line in NYC. There is a deck park in southern Dallas (not that we need to

emulate the size of anything in Texas). Atlanta is considering several proposals for parks

to be built above congested areas downtown. Philadelphia has a park that goes over the

Schuylkill River. Seattle, Phoenix, Chicago and Boston have deck parks.

13. Here's a link to an interesting article.

“There’s been a sort of a sea change in the way people think about roads and real estate in general,” said Ed McMahon, a senior fellow at the Urban Land Institute, a Washington, D.C., nonprofit that focuses on land use. “If you design a city around cars, you’re going to get more cars. If you design a city around people, you’re going to get more people and places and better real estate value.”

In conclusion to this long letter, I ask TPAC and the City Council to please explore seriously,

in an incremental fashion the possibilities of a deck park across the Merrimack between exits 13 and 14 that is accessible from downtown. Concord has the opportunity to do

something visionary and great for the future. Let’s do it!

Thank you all for serving and for all you do.


Claudia C. Damon


REMINDER: Testify at tonight's TPAC meeting on I-93 Expansion (6:30pm City Chambers). Together, we can request a feasibility study for a Deck Park (Highway Cap) to connect our city! RSVP so we know you're coming.

395 views0 comments


bottom of page